Evidence: "How do we know what we know?"
Viewpoint: "Who's speaking?"
Connections: "What causes what?"
Supposition: "How might things have been different?"
Relevance: "Who cares?" "So what?"
Once upon a time, HTH had adopted this same set of habits (although they preferred the term "perspective" over "viewpoint"). I think they should bring them back.
I realize now, as I don't think I have done before, that I imply a lot of these habits in the work I do with my students, particularly the first three, although I rarely make explicit the manner in which these habits can be learned and cultivated. The fourth - supposition - is the one I practice least in my own life, and so is not surprisingly the one I promote least in my own classroom.
The fifth - relevance - is the one I think we as teachers do the worst job of addressing with our students. What I mean is that we too rarely have a good answer to the questions, "Why are we learning this?" or "When am I ever going to use this in my life?" Although the relevance of our curricular content is usually (hopefully) clear to us, it's not made clear to students. It's not surprising, then, when students have a hard time applying it to their own work.
References:
Meier, D. (1995). The Power of Their Ideas, (50). Boston: Beacon Press.
2 comments:
While many (well, Aguirre) argue we never left HOM, my main goal for the upcoming year is to make them more integrated into each class. HOM is true learning, thinking, and understanding!
I know Mark is still doing the Habits of Mind, but I think he's one of very few people who still make them explicit in what they do. And it shows in the students that come out of his classes - having taught them the following year, they definitely stand out from other kids.
I'm excited to hear you're going to bring them back - like high fives and Reebok Pumps!
Post a Comment